Wisconsin Football’s Attack Score: Graham Mertz Struggles to Find the Rhythm

The Wisconsin Badgers He struggled hard on Saturday, as penalties, spins and failure to execute were to blame for their first loss of the 2022 season, which came at the hands of the unseeded. Washington State Cougars.

Here are the Badgers’ offensive scores:

Midfield: C +

After an effective outing in Week 1, Graham Mertz’s play took a step back in Week 2, completing just 18/31 passes for 227 yards, two touchdowns, and an interception.

However, the square’s points do not paint the full picture, either positively or negatively.

Problems from Mertz’s first start, such as the lack of readings, plagued him again, as he occasionally lengthened playing periods by trying to find different options, disabling the offense.

In addition, Meretz does not appear to have the same amount of confidence in his offensive line, as he slashed to his right on several occasions, limiting his view of midfield as he would only see half the field in those plays.

The change from Mertz’s performance in Week 1 was a desire to challenge the on-pitch defense, as the junior looked for Keontez Lewis on several occasions. Last week, Mertz didn’t complete a single pass for more than 20 aerobic yards, but that changed in the second week, indicating an evolution in his technique.

However, Mertz wasn’t entirely accurate on those throws, knocking him down on one occasion, while being saved with an unnecessary pass on another.

But, if Mertz continues to show a desire to throw the field, it will expand the defenses vertically, forcing them away from stacking the box, which in turn opens up the running game.

It wasn’t all Mertz’s fault, with Bobby Ingram’s play calls far worse than they were in the first week, with a drop in play action, as well as questionable choices in early meltdowns, resulting in tougher transfers.

Furthermore, upon Mertes’ interception, the quarterback was hit on the throw, which was partially blamed on the offensive line, resulting in a spin.

Overall, Mertz certainly didn’t have the prettiest performance, but he showed an evolution with a desire to test the pitch’s defense, and he didn’t have the best conditions around him, hence the C+ score.

Running appearance: b-

After rushing for 221 yards in 37 attempts in the first week, the Badgers struggled to the ground in week two as a team, only collecting 174 yards in 44 attempts (4.0 yards per carry), which is why the offense sometimes stopped.

Braelon Allen did well, rushing for 98 yards in 21 attempts, but was hesitant again to hit the fairways at times; The lack of decisiveness is more likely to be attributed to poor offensive linear play rather than a change in Allen’s mindset.

When Allen is decisive, the potential is so high because a sophomore is out of reach for his size, displays the ability to make cuts and keep going at a good pace.

Chez Mellusi fared worse in the second week, rushing for just 44 yards in 15 attempts after averaging 4.8 yards per load in the first week.

Mellusi does not necessarily possess any elitist traits, but he has shown the ability to get the job done; The close split in the workload between him and Allen was certainly intriguing, given that the former player was struggling to create bigger plays on Saturday.

Wisconsin’s offensive looked more predictable in the second week, with Wisconsin running 12-man for most of the game, which Washington State’s tough defensive line was poised for.

As a result, the running game couldn’t materialize, especially early on, which put an even more difficult burden on Graham Mertz, who was only able to muster 14 points through the air.

Braelon Allen still had an effective game, but the hasty attack generally struggled compared to Week 1, hence the grade B.

Wide receivers: C +

After a week in which the exhibitors dominated the offensive flow, the unit struggled to create plays against the Cougars.

Last week, Chimere Dike and Markus Allen each had three cuts, and while the former had four receptions for 31 yards, both players lost a pass on Saturday, killing the offense flow in the time.

Allen disappointed in week two after looking like one of Graham Mertz’s top choices, pulling just one of his four goals for 11 yards.

Skyler Bell didn’t shine much in either week after a solid boot camp, getting two passes for 17 yards, while rushing three times for 12 yards.

Bale wasn’t much of a threat to Mertz, which limits his value, but his progression in attack would be something to watch in the following weeks.

On the bright side, University of California Receiver Keontez Lewis looks like the team’s biggest deep threat, constantly hitting his defender in the line of scrimmage with his release package, pulling two passes for 62 yards.

Although Lewis doesn’t have a high velocity of deep threats, his release package has consistently created an open look, giving Mertz a chance to network for a big play, which on some occasions has happened.

Overall, the reception room was disappointed by the passing drop on Saturday, but there could be a re-emergence in attack as the season lengthens.

Narrow Ends: B-

Originally, it looked like a strong night for tight ends, as top choice Clay Condive had two touchdown passes en route to being Wisconsin’s leading second receiver in week two with four catches and 35 yards.

However, Hayden Roche, who didn’t see a single goal after two attempts in the first week, scored a 15-yard penalty at the back, while Kondev made the ball at a crucial point of the match.

It’s a good sign that Mertz is looking for his safety blanket at Cundiff, who has found ways to open up, as the tight end had six goals on Saturday, ranking second among the Badgers’ top players.

Now, it’s up to Cundiff and Rucci to implement and damage reduction to provide an opportunity for the attack to place points. Before Cundiff faltered, the narrow end room looked like the best unit in attack. In general, though, the group scales at B- when it involves penalties and changes.

NCAA Football: Illinois State in Wisconsin

Jeff Hansch – USA Today Sports

offensive line: c-

The offensive line struggled hard on Saturday against a strong Washington State defensive front, failing to consistently create holes in the running game, while also forcing Graham Mertz to constantly improvise, leaving the budding quarterback on his feet too much.

The Badgers rushed for just four yards to carry, and left-footed guard Tyler Beach echoed the feeling that the offensive line needed to improve today’s performance.

Even the left flank of the offensive line, which was Wisconsin’s bread and butter, ran into difficulties, and seemed to be relied upon even more with Mahmoud’s absence, making the attack more predictable.

Overall, the Badgers committed 11 penalties for 106 yards, many of which came up front, including two calls to center Joe Tipman and a chop block on right guard Michael Fortney.

If Wisconsin is to continue competing at a high level in 2022, they must improve their offensive linear style of play, which should come with more familiarity with a fairly new group.

In the good news, Beach received high praise for left-footed tackler Jack Nelson, who is believed to have played superbly to start the season in a new position.

However, penalties, a lack of a well-established rushing attack and inconsistent play rank the offensive streak among Badger’s worst-position group on Saturday.

Leave a Comment